Current Consumption Analysis of LCD and AMOLED Display Technologies: An Approach Based on Multi-Text Input Modalities
Keywords:
Power Consumption, Display, LCD, AMOLED, SmartphoneAbstract
When evaluating battery consumption in mobile devices in the fifth-generation (5G) network, it is crucial to consider the display technology used, as different technologies consume varying amounts of energy. Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) and Dynamic Active Matrix Organic Light-Emitting Diode (AMOLED) are two prevalent display technologies. LCD is an older technology that remains widely used due to its affordability and widespread availability. On the other hand, Dynamic AMOLED is a more advanced display technology in modern smartphones. Typing on a keyboard, swiping through screens, and using voice commands consume different amounts of power. This paper aims to analyze the current consumption of display technologies, in different baseline scenarios, and text input methods. A comparative analysis was conducted between smartphones equipped with LCD and Dynamic AMOLED displays. The results demonstrated that Dynamic AMOLED technology consistently saved energy, achieving reductions of up to approximately 40% in specific modes such as standby or reading. In contrast, PLS LCD has around 30% higher average current consumption than Dynamic AMOLED. Dynamic AMOLED offers notable advantages in energy savings under specific modes, understanding the nuances between display technologies and input modalities helps users and manufacturers of 5G mobile devices make informed decisions about smartphone selection and usage patterns.
Downloads
References
J. Chen, W. Cranton, and M. Fihn, Handbook of visual display technology. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 2016, DOI:
1007/978-3-319-14346-0.
K. Mikami, “In-plane switching mode liquid crystal display device,” South Korea Patent KR100293436B1, Nov. 2003. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-
-90924-x.
Y. Li, F. You, M. Ji, and X. You, “The influence of smartphone text input method, posture, and enivronment on user experience,” International
Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 36, no. 12, p. 1110–1121,2020. DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2020.1719465.
S. Ghosh, K. Hiware, N. Ganguly, B. Mitra, and P. De, “Emotion detection from touch interactions during text entry on smartphones,”
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 130, pp. 47–57, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.04.005.
A. Rolich, E. Fedotova, and S. Saprykina, “Study of the energy consumption of graphical interfaces on tft displays,” pp. 205–210, 2019.
DOI: 10.1109/REDUNDANCY48165.2019.9003316.
A. Prabha, “Power saving and optimization of oled displays for better system design: A survey,” pp. 1–4, 2023. DOI: 10.1109/ICIPTM57143.2023.10117875.
F. Jiang, E. Zarepour, M. Hassan, A. Seneviratne, and P. Mohapatra, “When to type, talk, or swype: Characterizing energy consumption
of mobile input modalities,” pp. 114–122, 2015. DOI: 10.1109/PERCOM.2015.7146517.
Q. Liu and T. Zhang, “P-13.14: Comparison between amoled and traditional display technology and application of amoled,” in SID Symposium
Digest of Technical Papers, vol. 53, no. S1. Wiley Online Library, 2022, pp. 1018–1021. DOI: 10.1002/sdtp.16 179.
M. A. Fusella, V. M. Menon, and N. J. Thompson, “New physics for better oleds,” IDinformation display, vol. 28, 2024. DOI: 10.1002/msid.1471.
P. Dash and Y. C. Hu, “How much battery does dark mode save? an accurate oled display power profiler for modern smartphones,”
in Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, 2021, pp. 323–335. DOI:
1145/3 458 864.346 768.
J. O. De Sousa, R. M. Ribeiro, B. De M. Pinheiro, and J. J. A. Arnez, “Power consumption analysis in lcd and amoled display technologies for mobile devices,” in 2025 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), 2025, pp. 1–2. DOI: 10.1109/ICCE63 647.2025.10 930 080.
J. O. de Sousa, G. C. Fonseca, J. W. A. de Oliveira, and R. N. Santos, “A novel non-invasive method to measure power consumption on smart-
phones,” in 2021 Brazilian Power Electronics Conference (COBEP), 2021, pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/COBEP53 665.2021.9 684 072