Benchmarking of modeled solar irradiation data in Uruguay at a daily time scale
Keywords:
Solar Resource assessment, satellite estimation, radiation models, GHIAbstract
Accurate solar radiation data are required for solar energy development. In absence of long-term ground measurements, practitioners rely on modeled data, which typically is of unknown uncertainty. This article benchmarks solar irradiation estimation models over Uruguay, analyzing uncertainty behavior and providing recommendations. The performance of six models is evaluated using controlled-quality ground measurements for an extended period, being one of the few benchmark studies in Latin America. The LCIM, a model specially adapted for the region and based on GOES-East satellite images, exhibits the highest accuracy and spatial consistency with a remarkably low root mean squared deviation of 6% and mean bias of less than 1%. The NSRDB and GL1.2 estimates have also a competitive performance and are well-suited alternatives. The MERRA2 database presents high deviations and should not be an option for solar resource assessment in the region without post-processing. This research is a first step towards a South American benchmark and provides information on which estimation models are suitable for large-scale solar energy projects in the region.
Downloads
References
M. Schnitzer, C. Thuman, and P. Johnson. The impact of solar uncertainty on project financeability: mitigating
energy risk through on-site monitoring. In Proceedings of the American Solar Energy Society (ASES), pages 1–5,
Denver, Colorado, United States., 13-17 May 2012.
A. McMahan, C. Grover, and F. Vignola. Evaluation of resource risk in solar-project financing. In J. Kleissl, ed-
itor, Solar Energy Forecasting and Resource Assessment, pages 81–95. Academic Press, Boston, 2013.
F. Vignola, C. Grover, N. Lemon, and A. McMahan. Building a bankable solar radiation dataset. Solar Energy,
(8):2218–2229, 2012.
J. Polo et al. Benchmarking on improvement and site-adaptation techniques for modeled solar radiation
datasets. Solar Energy, 201:469–479, 2020.
G. Huang, Z. Li, X. Li, S. Liang, K. Yang, D. Wang, and Y. Zhang. Estimating surface solar irradiance from
satellites: past, present, and future perspectives. Remote Sensing of Environment, 233:111371, 2019.
G. Salazar, C. Gueymard, J. Galdino, O. de Castro Vilela, and N. Fraidenraich. Solar irradiance time series derived from high-quality measurements, satellite-based models, and reanalyses at a near-equatorial site in Brazil. Renew. and Sust. Energy Reviews, 117:109478, 2020.
D. Yang and J.M. Bright. Worldwide validation of 8 satellite-derived and reanalysis solar radiation products:
A preliminary evaluation and overall metrics for hourly data over 27 years. Solar Energy, 210:3–19, 2020.
C. Gueymard. Solar radiation resource: measurement, modeling, and methods. In T.M. Letcher, editor, Com-
prehensive Renewable Energy, pages 176–212. Elsevier, Oxford, second edition, 2022.
R. Perez, P. Ineichen, K. Moore, M. Kmiecik, C. Chain, R. George, F., and Vignola. A new operational model for
satellite-derived irradiances: description and validation. Solar Energy, 73:307–317, 2002.
C. Rigollier, M. Lefevre, and L. Wald. The method Heliosat-2 for deriving shortwave solar radiation from
satellite images. Solar Energy, 77(2):159–169, 2004.
J. Ceballos, M. Bottino, and J. de Souza. A simplified physical model for assessing solar radiation over Brazil
using GOES 8 visible imagery. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 109(D2), 2004.
D. Kratz, P. Stackhouse, S. Gupta, A. Wilber, P. Sawaengphokhai, and G. McGarragh. The fast long-
wave and shortwave flux (FLASHFlux) data product: Single-scanner footprint fluxes. Journal of Applied Me-
teorology and Climatology, 53(4):1059 – 1079, 2014.
Y. Xie, M. Sengupta, and J. Dudhia. A fast all-sky radiation model for solar applications (FARMS): Algorithm
and performance evaluation. Solar Energy, 135:435–445, 2016.
Z. Qu et al. Fast radiative transfer parameterisation for assessing the surface solar irradiance: the Heliosat-
method. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 26(1):33–57, 02 2017.
A. Laguarda, G. Giacosa, R. Alonso-Suárez, and G. Abal. Performance of the site-adapted CAMS database and
locally adjusted cloud index models for estimating global solar horizontal irradiation over the Pampa Húmeda.
Solar Energy, 199:295–307, 2020.
P. Ineichen. Long term satellite global, beam and diffuse irradiance validation. In Elsevier Energy Procedia, volume 48, pages 1586–1596, 2014. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Solar Heating and Cooling for Buildings and Industry (SHC 2013).
A. Forstinger et al. Expert quality control of solar radiation ground data sets. In ISES Solar World Congress,
Oct 2021.
M. Peel, B. Finlayson, and T. Mcmahon. Updated world map of the köppen-geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 11:1633–1644, 2007
F. Marchesoni-Acland and R. Alonso-Suárez. Intra-day solar irradiation forecast using rls filters and satellite
images. Renewable Energy, 161:1140–1154, 2020.
C. Rigollier, O. Bauer, and L. Wald. On the clear sky model of the ESRA—European Solar Radiation At-
las—with respect to the Heliosat method. Solar energy, 68(1):33–48, 2000.
F. Linke. Transmissions-koeffizient und trubungsfaktor. Meteoreorological Magazine Beitraege zur Physik der
AtmosphaereBeitr, 10:91–103, 1922.
A. Laguarda and G. Abal. Clear-Sky broadband irradiance: first model assessment in Uruguay. In ISES Conf.
Proceedings, Solar World Congress, pages 1–12, 2017.
B. Mayer and A. Kylling. Technical note: The libRadtran software package for radiative transfer calculations –
description and examples of use. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 5:1855–1877, 2005.
K. Kriebel, G. Gesell, M. Kästner, and H. Mannstein. The cloud analysis tool APOLLO: Improvements and
validations. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(12):2389–2408, 2003.
J. Gonzalez, V. Teixeira-Branco, and R. Alonso-Suárez. Evaluation of the Heliosat-4 and FLASHFlux models for
solar global daily irradiation estimate in Uruguay. In ISES Conf. Proceedings, Solar World Congress, 2019.
D. Rutan et al. CERES synoptic product: Methodology and validation of surface radiant flux. Journal of At-
mospheric and Oceanic Technology, 32(6):1121 – 1143, 2015.
D. Fillmore, D. Rutan, S. Kato, F. Rose, and T. Caldwell. Evaluation of aerosol optical depths and clear-sky radiative fluxes of the CERES Edition 4.1 SYN1deg data product. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 22(15):10115–10137, 2022.
A.C.S Porfirio and J.C Ceballos. A method for estimating direct normal irradiation from goes geostationary satellite imagery: Validation and application over northeast brazil. Solar Energy, 155(1):178–190, 2017.
Classification of GOES imagery (Imager and ABI) at DISSM/CGCT/INPE: Related centroids (in
portuguese). Relatorio Técnico GSTAR RT-002-2022. http://pururuca.cptec.inpe.br/gstar/GSTAR dados.html.
Accessed: March 2023.
M. Sengupta, Y. Xie, A. Lopez, A. Habte, G. Maclaurin, and J. Shelby. The National Solar Radiation Data Base
(NSRDB). Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, pages 51–60, 2018.
R. Gelaro et al. The Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA-2).
Journal of Climate, 30:5419–5454, 2017.
F. Feng and K. Wang. Does the Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications-2 aerosol
reanalysis introduce an improvement in the simulation of surface solar radiation over China? International Journal
of Climatology, 39(3):1305–1318, 2019.
M. Rienecker et al. MERRA: NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications.
Journal of Climate, 24(14):3624 – 3648, 2011.
L.J.B. McArthur. Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN) Operations Manual. Td-no. 1274, 9 wrcp/wmo, World Meteorological Organization (WMO), 2005. www.wmo.org.
J.A. Duffie and W.A. Beckman. Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes. Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New
Jersey, third edition, 2006.
Jie Zhang, Anthony Florita, Bri-Mathias Hodge, Siyuan Lu, Hendrik F Hamann, Venkat Banunarayanan, and
Anna M Brockway. A suite of metrics for assessing the performance of solar power forecasting. Solar Energy,
:157–175, 2015.
B. Espinar, L. Ramı́rez, A. Drews, H. G. Beyer, L. F. Zarzalejo, J. Polo, and L. y Marı́n. Analysis of different
comparison parameters applied to solar radiation data from satellite and german radiometric stations. Solar
Energy, 83(1):118–125, 2009.
